|
ASAC MEETING MINUTES
9/17/03
Mapunapuna
Minutes taken by David Mulinix / Formatted by Cheryl Kaster
ATTTENDANCE:
PROGRAM COMMITTEE: Linda Colburn
ASAC
Present: Richard
Braunskill, William Corless, Lynette Cruz, Cheryl Kaster, David Mulinix,
Laurie Veatch,
Absent: Michael
Goodrich, Dennis Ragsdale
Quorum: Yes
STAFF: Keali'i
Lopez, Mary Roblee, Michele Turner
COMMUNITY: Kema Corless (Producer),
Jeff Garland (Producer)
Lynette agreed to chair the meeting,
pending the selection of a new chair from the members of the newly-elected
ASAC.
Called to Order: 6:45pm
CHANGE IN AGENDA:
It was agreed that Item 3 of the agenda should be moved
to Item 1. Richard was offered the opportunity to remain in the
meeting, or to be excused, during the discussion and voting on the subject
of his eligibility to remain on ASAC while an employee of ‘Olelo.
He chose to remain in the meeting.
1. ASAC CANDIDATE ELIGIBILITY FOR ELECTION
It has been the general practice in the past that employees
are not eligible to be members of ASAC.
QUESTIONS: Whether or not Richard Braunskill, who after
being elected became a part-time, temporary employee of ‘Olelo,
should be allowed to continue be seated as a member of ASAC; and
The following was agreed by the ASAC members:
The policy has been that employees are not be permitted
to serve on ASAC. However, because this policy has not been written
down elsewhere in ASAC's procedures, prior to this time, it was decided
that:
Richard Braunskill will attend meetings,
but will not be formally seated as a voting member of ASAC until his contract
with ‘Olelo ends, which is scheduled to be some time in November.
At the November ASAC meeting, his
employment status will be looked at again and if his employment has ended,
he will be officially seated as a member of ASAC. If his employment
is continuing with ‘Olelo, then the process for filling Richard's
seat on ASAC will be implemented;
Lynette Cruz, a past ASAC member
who has agreed to continue for a period of three months to assist with
the transition, will fill Richard's seat, with full voting privileges,
until the November meeting.
QUESTION: Should there be a waiting period before
former ‘Olelo staff will be eligible to run for election to ASAC?
It was agreed by the ASAC members that this question
be placed on the agenda for the next meeting in order to give the absent
members an opportunity for input before a final decision is made.
2. APPROVAL OF PRIOR MINUTES (August 20, 2003 Meeting)
Amendments/Comments to minutes as presented :
Cheryl noted and it was agreed that there was not a
quorum at the last meeting.
Cheryl stated that the minutes should reflect that
originally everyone, including Gary Honda agreed that the five winners
of the ASAC election would be announced at that the end of that meeting.
Because of later discussions in the meeting with regard to seeking approval
to seat seven members instead of five, Gary then made an executive decision
at the end of the meeting not to announce the winners until he could discuss
it with the Program Committee and seek and obtain approval from the Executive
Committee of the ‘Olelo BOD to announce seven winners.
The minutes were approved with the changes noted concerning
the delayed announcement of the ASAC winners.
3. ASAC STRUCTURE & ORGANIZATION
[In order to get these draft minutes
to the members and participants as quickly as possible, Cheryl will post
her recommendations separately, but in any case, no later than Wednesday,
September 24, 2003.]
4. CONSTITUENCY ISSUES
A. Jeff Garland submitted a 15 point
agenda for ASAC's consideration and response. It was decided that:
1. Members of
ASAC who were interested/able to do so, would go through the items with
an eye toward first determining which of the items on Jeff's list did,
in fact, fall under the scope of ASAC to address, and
2. Having made
the determination of which were ASAC issues, a further effort would be
made to separate the concerns into categories based on the subject, and
to work on addressing each of those issues in a timely manner.
Lynette specifically
volunteered to work on this project.
B. Traffic cams on two channels at
once (52 and 53)(#13 on Jeff's 15-point agenda).
Traffic cams
on 2 channels at once, why? Is ‘Oleo considering changing
the traffic cams from 52 to 53 and wants the public to get used to it?
Couldn't the crawl currently used on both channels be used for that purpose
and the channel space on 52 could be better used for client programming
than duplicate government-oriented programming?
Mary Roblee, Director of Client
Services, stated that:
The traffic cameras are being shown
on two channels, 52 and 53 only during the bus strike. Once the
strike is over, they will be shown only on channel 53.
5. ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting will be on Wednesday, October 15,
2003, at 6:30 p.m., at Mapunapuna.
6. NEXT MEETING
Wednesday October 15, 2003
Adjourned: 9:00pm
Respectfully submitted, as corrected,
Cheryl Kaster
Secretary
| For
more information: |
|
834-0007 |
|
 |